Skip to content
Popular Calculators
Browse Health calculators

Calorie Calculator

Daily calories for a goal, with the plateau built in — because the 3,500-calorie rule draws a straight line and weight loss is a curve.

Units (optional)

Results come back in whichever you choose.

Sex (optional)

The equations use it as a proxy for average body composition.

The largest source of error in the whole estimate. If you are between two, pick the lower.

Optional. Given it, the resting figure uses Katch-McArdle instead of Mifflin-St Jeor.

About the Calorie Calculator

How many calories to eat for a goal. Which is a different question from how many you burn today — that is the TDEE calculator, and this one starts where it finishes.

The difference matters because of a rule that almost every calorie calculator repeats and almost none examines:

The 3,500-calorie rule draws a straight line, and weight loss is a curve.

How to Use the Calorie Calculator

Enter age, sex, height and weight, pick an activity level, and choose a goal.

Body fat percentage is optional — supply it and the resting figure uses Katch-McArdle, which works from lean mass.

Step-by-Step Example

Male, 35, 180cm, 95kg, moderately active, losing 0.5kg a week.

  Resting burn:              1,905
  × 1.55 for moderate:       2,953  maintenance
  − 550 for 0.5 kg a week
                            ──────
  Daily intake:              2,403

The 550 comes from 0.5 kg × 7,700 calories per kilogram ÷ 7 days. So far this is what every calorie calculator does.

Where the Straight Line Breaks

The 3,500-calorie rule says: a pound of fat is 3,500 calories, so a 500-a-day deficit loses a pound a week, 52 pounds a year, forever.

The arithmetic is fine. The projection is wrong, and it is wrong for a reason that is obvious once stated: it holds your expenditure fixed while your body shrinks.

After a year at 2,403 caloriesWeight
3,500-calorie rule predicts68.9 kg
Recomputing burn each month76.1 kg
Difference7.2 kg

Over seven kilograms of difference, from the same intake. And the reason is visible month by month:

  month 1:   92.8 kg,  deficit now 550
  month 3:   88.9 kg,  deficit now 485
  month 6:   83.8 kg,  deficit now 401
  month 12:  76.1 kg,  deficit now 274

You chose a 550-calorie deficit. By month twelve you are running a 274-calorie one — without changing a single thing about what you eat.

The Plateau Is the Plan

This leads somewhere useful rather than merely discouraging.

Every intake has a weight at which your expenditure equals it. Below that you gain, above it you lose, and at it you stop. For this example, 2,403 calories a day settles at about 59.5 kg.

So the honest way to read a calorie target is not "this is my deficit" but:

This is the intake that takes me to X and holds me there.

A plateau is not a failure, a broken metabolism, or evidence that something went wrong. It is the arithmetic finishing. It arrives on schedule whether or not anyone does anything, and knowing where it will arrive turns it from a setback into a milestone.

Breaking through it means eating less again or moving more — not because the plan stopped working, but because it worked and the numbers have changed with you.

Even This Curve Is Optimistic

Worth being straight about.

The adaptive projection accounts for a smaller body burning less. It does not account for metabolic adaptation — the further drop in expenditure that a sustained deficit produces beyond what weight change alone explains.

Real loss is usually slower again than the adaptive figure. Treat it as a ceiling rather than a forecast, and correct against the scale.

Raising Activity Beats Cutting Intake

A practical consequence.

Cutting intake lowers the number you eat. Raising activity lifts maintenance, which widens the deficit and pushes the settling weight down — and it does not run into a floor the way cutting does.

The activity multiplier is also where the leverage is: moving one category is worth around 300 calories on a typical profile, where the choice of BMR equation is worth about 100.

The Floors

The calculator flags intakes below 1,200 for women and 1,500 for men.

These are not hard physiology; they are sensible floors. Below them, adequate protein and micronutrients become genuinely hard to hit, and the body compensates by reducing spontaneous movement — which quietly erodes the deficit you were trying to create.

A slower rate usually reaches the same place more reliably. Anything more aggressive is worth discussing with a doctor or dietitian rather than a calculator.

Understanding Your Result

Daily calories is the intake for your goal.

Against maintenance shows the deficit or surplus.

A year from now runs both projections side by side.

Where it settles gives the plateau weight for this intake.

Worth knowing flags a floor breach or explains what the settling point means.

When Should You Use This Calculator?

Setting a starting intake. As a hypothesis to test, not a prescription.

Before a plateau, not after. Knowing where it lands changes how it feels.

When loss has stalled. Recalculate at your new weight; the number has moved.

To compare goals. The faster rates are not proportionally faster in the long run.

Common Mistakes

Trusting the 3,500-calorie rule as a projection. It is a straight line through a curve.

Reading a plateau as failure. It is the intake arriving where it was always going.

Eating at BMR instead of maintenance. That is an accidental deficit of hundreds.

Not recalculating after losing weight. The old deficit is not the current one.

Going below the floor to hit a date. Slower is usually faster in practice.

Treating any of it as measured. These are estimates on top of estimates.

These are population estimates and can be well out for any individual. Nothing here is medical or dietary advice — speak to a doctor or registered dietitian before making significant changes to what you eat, particularly if you have any medical condition.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories should I eat to lose weight?

Maintenance less about 550 a day for half a kilogram a week, which the calculator works out from your own figures. The more useful answer is that the number is not permanent: as you lose, your expenditure falls, so the same intake produces a shrinking deficit. The calculator shows where that intake would eventually leave you rather than pretending the loss continues indefinitely.

Is the 3,500-calorie rule wrong?

As arithmetic for a single week it is fine. As a projection it is badly wrong, because it holds your expenditure fixed while your body shrinks. On a 95 kg starting weight at a 550-a-day deficit, the rule predicts 68.9 kg after a year while recomputing expenditure monthly gives 76.1 kg — a gap of over 7 kg. The rule predicts a straight line and weight loss is a curve.

Why do I plateau even though nothing changed?

Because something did change: you got smaller, and a smaller body costs less to run. The deficit decays toward zero and weight settles where your expenditure equals your intake. That settling point is a property of the intake you chose, not a failure of willpower, and the calculator computes it so you know in advance where it will arrive.

How do I break through a plateau?

Eat less again, or move more — because the arithmetic that got you here has genuinely changed. The plateau is not a sign the plan stopped working; it is the plan finishing. Recalculating at your new weight gives the intake for the next stretch. Raising activity is often the better lever, since it moves maintenance up rather than intake down.

Should I eat below 1,200 calories?

Generally not without supervision. The calculator flags intakes below 1,200 for women and 1,500 for men because very low intakes make adequate protein and micronutrients hard to reach, and the body compensates by reducing spontaneous movement — which quietly shrinks the deficit you were aiming for. A slower rate usually gets there more reliably.

Is the adaptive projection accurate?

More accurate than the straight line, and still optimistic. It accounts for a smaller body burning less, but not for metabolic adaptation — the additional drop in expenditure that a sustained deficit produces beyond what the weight change explains. Treat it as a ceiling rather than a forecast, and correct against the scale over several weeks.

Last reviewed September 24, 2026 by the CalculatorPeak editorial team.