Skip to content
Popular Calculators
Browse Finance calculators

Inflation Calculator

What money is worth at another point in time — and whether a pay rise actually was one, which is the question people usually arrive with.

What do you want to work out?

About the Inflation Calculator

What money is worth at a different point in time, forwards or backwards.

The arithmetic is one line. What makes an inflation calculator worth having is the two things almost everybody gets wrong about it — and the second is usually the question people actually arrived with.

Inflation does not add up. Thirty years at 3% is not 90%.

A pay rise below inflation is a pay cut, and the size of it is not the difference between the two percentages either.

How to Use the Inflation Calculator

What will this cost? takes an amount today and shows what it will cost after a period of inflation.

What is this worth today? goes the other way — a future or past amount, in today's spending power.

Did my pay rise beat inflation? compares a rise against an inflation rate and gives the real change.

Step-by-Step Example

£50,000 of spending, 30 years, 3% inflation.

  50,000 × (1 + 3%)³⁰  =  121,363.12

What costs £50,000 today will cost £121,363.12 in thirty years. Prices rise by £71,363.12, which is 142.73% in total.

Not 90%.

Why It Is Not 3 × 30

Multiplying the rate by the years is the intuitive move and it is wrong, because each year's inflation applies to prices that have already risen.

RateYearsAdditiveActual
3%1030%34.39%
3%3090%142.73%
4%520%21.67%
4%30120%224.34%

At five years the gap is small enough to ignore. At thirty it is more than half the answer again, and the shortcut understates every long-horizon figure.

Going Backwards

The same formula, divided rather than multiplied:

  50,000 ÷ (1 + 3%)³⁰  =  20,599.34

£50,000 arriving in thirty years has the spending power of £20,599.34 today. £29,400.66 — 58.8% of it — is lost to inflation.

This is the conversion that matters for any long-dated amount: a pension projection, a savings target, a price quoted years out. A sum in future money compared against today's prices is the single most common way a financial plan flatters itself.

Did Your Pay Rise Beat Inflation?

This is the question most people arrive with, and it is almost never offered.

£45,000 salary, a 3% rise, 4% inflation:

  What you got:     45,000 × 1.03  =  46,350.00
  What you needed:  45,000 × 1.04  =  46,800.00
                                       ────────
  Behind by:                             450.00 a year

A real cut of 0.96%, on a payslip where the number went up.

That is the whole difficulty with inflation as a pay issue: nothing visible went backwards. The rise happened, it was announced, it appeared in the pay packet. The loss is entirely in what the money buys.

Why 0.96% and not 1%

Subtracting the rates gives −1%. The correct calculation divides:

  (1 + 3%) ÷ (1 + 4%) − 1  =  −0.96%

At these numbers the shortcut is close. At 12% against 15% the gap is wider, and it widens as the rates rise — which is exactly when people most need the figure.

What Rate Should You Use?

Central bank targets in developed economies are usually around 2%, and long-run averages tend to run a little above. The default here is 3%, which is mildly cautious.

Beyond about twenty years the rate is doing more work than any other input. A thirty-year figure at a single assumed rate is an illustration, not a forecast — inflation has run from negative to double digits within living memory, and no thirty-year period has resembled its own average closely.

Run it a point higher and a point lower. If the decision changes, the decision was never robust.

Deflation

A negative rate is handled rather than refused. Money gains purchasing power instead of losing it, and the arithmetic is identical.

It is rarer than inflation and generally worse for an economy — falling prices give people a reason to postpone spending, which reduces demand, which pushes prices down further. But it is a real case, not an input error.

Understanding Your Result

The answer is the converted amount or the real change.

What it means puts it in plain terms.

The difference is what was gained or lost.

Why it is not the simple version shows the compounding against the additive shortcut.

Worth knowing covers the caveat that applies — a long horizon resting on one assumed rate, a deflation case, or what a below-inflation rise really means.

When Should You Use This Calculator?

On any long-dated figure. Pension projections, savings goals, future prices.

When you get a pay rise. Check it against inflation before deciding how you feel about it.

When comparing a past amount to today. "My first salary was £12,000" means very little without conversion.

Before judging a savings return. A 4% return against 4% inflation is a 0% real return.

Common Mistakes

Multiplying the rate by the years. It understates badly over long periods.

Subtracting inflation from a pay rise. Divide. The error grows with the rates.

Treating one assumed rate as a forecast over decades. It is an illustration.

Comparing future money to today's prices. Convert first, then judge.

Assuming a nominal return is a real one. The savings calculator does that conversion and takes tax off as well.

Using headline inflation for your own situation. The published figure is a basket average. If your spending is concentrated in housing or energy, your personal rate may be quite different.

Forgetting it applies to debts too. Inflation erodes the real value of a fixed-rate debt in exactly the same way it erodes savings — which is the one place it works in your favour.

Every figure here is an estimate for planning. Inflation varies considerably and this is not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is thirty years at 3% not 90%?

Because inflation compounds — each year's rise applies to prices that have already risen. Thirty years at 3% is 142.73%, not 90%, and 50,000 of spending becomes 121,363.12. Multiplying the rate by the years is the intuitive move and it understates every long-horizon answer, by more the longer the horizon.

Did my pay rise beat inflation?

Only if it exceeded the inflation rate, and the size of the gap is not the difference between the two percentages. A 3% rise against 4% inflation is a real cut of 0.96%, not 1% — the correct calculation divides rather than subtracts. On 45,000 that is 450 a year of lost ground, and it does not appear anywhere on a payslip.

What inflation rate should I use?

Central bank targets in developed economies are usually around 2% and long-run averages run a little higher. The default here is 3%, which is mildly cautious. Over anything beyond about twenty years the rate is doing more work than any other input, so it is worth trying it a point higher and a point lower before relying on the answer.

Can inflation be negative?

Yes, and the arithmetic handles it. Deflation means money gains purchasing power rather than losing it. It is rarer than inflation and generally worse for an economy, because falling prices encourage people to postpone spending, but it is a real case rather than an input error.

Where does this matter most?

Any amount quoted in future money. A pension projection, a savings goal, a price years out — all of them are routinely compared against today's prices, which is the most common way a financial plan flatters itself. Convert first, then judge.

Last reviewed September 24, 2026 by the CalculatorPeak editorial team.